This blog was created to present common clinical situations encountered in general practice in an accessible, practical and engaging way. It includes both clinical cases involving frequently seen dermatological conditions and the questions or uncertainties that often arise when assessing and treating a patient.
Antonio is 76 years old. He comes in because of a small bump that appeared on his left ear three months ago. He did not think much of it until something as ordinary as resting his ear on the pillow at night became painful.
The lesion also hurts when we examine and palpate it.
An attached tick should be removed as soon as possible. However, finding a tick does not mean that someone has Lyme disease and does not, by itself, justify prescribing antibiotics. Here are six practical questions on how to prevent, recognise and manage these situations.
The presence of a small, raised, soft, shiny lesion on the distal part of a finger
should suggest a digital myxoid cyst, particularly when it is located close to the nail.
And there is another clue that may be even more striking than the cyst itself:
a longitudinal groove in the nail plate.
Digital myxoid cyst located close to the proximal nail fold.
The longitudinal alteration of the nail plate secondary to involvement of the nail matrix can be seen.
A digital myxoid cyst, also known as a digital mucous cyst
or digital myxoid pseudocyst, is a benign lesion that usually develops near the
distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint and the nail unit.
It is usually less than 1 cm in diameter and presents as a small, smooth, rounded lesion,
either skin-coloured or slightly translucent. It is generally asymptomatic, although it may become
painful if inflamed or traumatized. Occasionally, it may spontaneously drain
clear, viscous and sticky material.
Why does it develop?
It is more common from the sixth decade of life onwards and has a well-established association
with osteoarthritis of the distal interphalangeal joint. In younger patients,
repetitive trauma or repeated use of the affected finger may also contribute to its development.
In most cases, these are small ganglion cysts related to the underlying joint, particularly when
degenerative joint changes are present.
Schematic representation of a digital myxoid cyst related to the distal interphalangeal joint. The contents are gelatinous and rich in hyaluronic acid.
The nail may provide the clue
This is probably one of the most interesting clinical features of a digital myxoid cyst.
When the lesion is located close to the proximal nail fold, it may compress the nail matrix.
Because the matrix is responsible for producing the nail plate, sustained pressure on a small area
may alter nail growth.
Cyst → pressure on the nail matrix → altered nail plate formation → longitudinal groove
The result may be a longitudinal depression or groove in the nail plate, producing
true canaliform nail dystrophy. In some patients, this nail change
may be more noticeable than the cyst itself.
Do we need additional investigations?
In most cases, no. Diagnosis is usually clinical, based on the combination
of the characteristic morphology and location.
When the lesion is subungual, has an atypical appearance or there is diagnostic uncertainty,
imaging may be useful and, occasionally, a biopsy may be required.
An X-ray may be useful when assessing for osteoarthritis
or osteophytes of the distal interphalangeal joint, although it is not routinely required.
Does it always need treatment?
No. A small, asymptomatic cyst can simply be observed.
Treatment may be considered when there is pain, recurrent inflammation or drainage,
thinning of the overlying skin, significant nail deformity, or functional or cosmetic impairment.
Treatment options
Option
Main advantage
Limitation
Observation
Appropriate for asymptomatic lesions. Avoids unnecessary procedures.
The cyst may persist or recur.
Drainage + compression therapy
Simple and minimally invasive. Sustained pressure may promote
collapse of the cyst, fibrosis and reduce refilling after drainage.
Recurrence may occur, and the available evidence is more limited than for surgery.
Cryotherapy
A relatively simple outpatient procedure.
Risk of recurrence and local tissue injury.
Sclerotherapy
A non-surgical alternative with a good response rate.
May cause pain, inflammation and recurrence.
Surgery
It has the highest cure rate; systematic reviews report rates approaching 95%.
Risk of scarring, stiffness, pain or infection.
The main disadvantage of conservative procedures is recurrence.
Surgery has the highest cure rate, particularly when the lesion is adequately treated
and, when appropriate, associated joint changes are addressed.
Take-home message
When you see a small, shiny or translucent lump close to a distal interphalangeal joint,
particularly in a patient with osteoarthritis, consider a digital myxoid cyst.
If there is also a longitudinal groove or canaliform nail dystrophy,
the nail itself may be pointing to the underlying problem.
Jabbour S, Kechichian E, Haber R, Tomb R, Nasr M.Management of digital mucous cysts: a systematic review and treatment algorithm.
International Journal of Dermatology. 2017;56:701-708.
PubMed
.
Laulan J, Chammas M.Digital mucous cyst.
Hand Surgery & Rehabilitation. 2024.
PubMed
.
Paronychia is inflammation of the tissues surrounding the nail and one of the most common nail disorders. Although different forms may look similar at first, distinguishing acute paronychia from chronic paronychia is essential because their mechanisms and treatment are different.
Practical rule: Pus or abscess → think acute paronychia. Loss of the cuticle → think chronic paronychia.
This blog was created to present common clinical situations
encountered in general practice in an accessible, practical and
engaging way. It includes both clinical cases involving frequently
seen conditions and the questions or uncertainties that often arise
when assessing and treating a patient.
Its aim is to
serve as a helpful resource for everyday clinical practice. The
topics are drawn directly from routine consultations and do not
follow a predetermined order, reflecting the way patients —and the
questions they bring— arrive in the consulting room.
Our intention is
to move away from overly academic discussions and to avoid focusing
on rare or particularly complex conditions, for which referral to a
dermatology specialist remains an appropriate option.
We hope this blog
will be useful to both general practitioners and medical students.
When should I use nicotinamide to prevent new cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas?
In patients with several previous skin cancers, nicotinamide may be used as an additional measure to reduce the development of new tumours. It does not replace photoprotection, treatment of actinic keratoses or dermatological follow-up.
Practical answer.Oral nicotinamide 500 mg every 12 hours may be offered to immunocompetent patients with a history of two or more cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas. The benefit is maintained while treatment is continued. I would not routinely recommend it in solid-organ transplant recipients.
Who is a good candidate?
The best-studied profile is a patient who is:
Immunocompetent
The strongest evidence comes from patients without immunosuppression.
Has previous tumours
Particularly if they have had two or more cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas in recent years.
Has persistent risk
Extensive photodamage, numerous actinic keratoses or repeated development of new carcinomas.
This is not primary prevention. There is insufficient evidence to recommend it generally to anyone with photodamage or isolated actinic keratoses who has never had skin cancer.
What benefit can I explain?
In the ONTRAC trial, 386 high-risk patients received nicotinamide 500 mg every 12 hours or placebo for 12 months. Nicotinamide reduced the development of new cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas by approximately 30%.
The important nuance: the effect disappeared after treatment was stopped. It should therefore not be presented as a one-year intervention that provides permanent protection.
How do I use it in practice?
Confirm the risk profile: an immunocompetent patient with two or more previous cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas.
Maintain the basic measures: photoprotection, self-examination, follow-up visits and treatment of actinic keratoses and early carcinomas.
Prescribe nicotinamide 500 mg every 12 hours. The studied regimen lasted 12 months.
Review tolerability and adherence. The benefit depends on the patient continuing treatment.
Safety
It is generally well tolerated. The most common adverse effects are gastrointestinal and usually improve after dose reduction or discontinuation.
Laboratory tests
At the dose used for chemoprevention, specific laboratory monitoring is not usually required.
Duration
The main evidence covers 12 months. The optimal duration beyond this period is not well defined.
What about transplant recipients?
In solid-organ transplant recipients, the ONTRANS trial included 158 patients and found no reduction in new keratinocyte cancers, cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas, basal cell carcinomas or actinic keratoses with nicotinamide 500 mg every 12 hours for 12 months.
Practical conclusion: do not use nicotinamide as a standard chemoprevention strategy in transplant recipients. The lack of recommendation is mainly due to the absence of a demonstrated clinical benefit, rather than major toxicity concerns.
Pocket algorithm
Situation
Practical approach
Immunocompetent patient with 2 or more previous carcinomas
Consider nicotinamide 500 mg every 12 hours as an additional measure.
Photodamage or actinic keratoses only, with no previous skin cancer
Do not recommend it routinely.
Solid-organ transplant recipient
Do not use it routinely; prioritise specialist follow-up and other preventive strategies.
Patient who stops treatment
Explain that the preventive benefit is not maintained after discontinuation.
Knowledge gaps
The optimal treatment duration beyond 12 months is not well established.
It has not been shown to reduce aggressive cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas, metastases or mortality.
In transplant recipients, the data are conflicting and further trials are needed.
Take-home message
Nicotinamide 500 mg every 12 hours is a simple and well-tolerated option for secondary prevention in immunocompetent patients with two or more previous cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas. It may reduce the development of new cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas while treatment is continued. It does not replace standard preventive measures and should not be used routinely in transplant recipients.
Main sources
Chen AC et al. A Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Nicotinamide for Skin-Cancer Chemoprevention. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1618-1626. Open.
Allen NC et al. Nicotinamide for Skin-Cancer Chemoprevention in Transplant Recipients. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:804-812. Open.
Stratigos AJ et al. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Part 1: Diagnostics and prevention — Update 2026. Eur J Cancer. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2026.116763.
Content intended for healthcare professionals. Individualise the indication and always maintain photoprotection, treatment of precursor lesions and clinical follow-up.
A 52-year-old patient has had facial lesions for about eight months; they began as small papules and pustules.
The patient had tried several topical treatments, but obtained only temporary relief with a cream containing clobetasol 0.05%, initially prescribed for a foot problem. They have been applying it daily to the face for three months.
Despite this, the condition continues to worsen and is accompanied by an intense burning sensation.
Diagnosis: steroid-induced rosacea-like dermatitis or steroid rosacea.
Steroid rosacea
Prolonged application of potent topical corticosteroids to the face can cause a condition that mimics or worsens rosacea.
It may present with persistent erythema, burning, flushing, papules, pustules, or inflammatory plaques. In some patients, it follows a predominantly perioral, periocular, or perinasal pattern.
The corticosteroid initially reduces inflammation and provides rapid improvement. However, continued use leads to dependence, loss of efficacy, and progressive worsening.
Key point: the immediate relief produced by the corticosteroid may conceal the fact that, in the medium term, it is perpetuating and worsening the condition.
The cycle of dependence
1. Initial improvement
The corticosteroid rapidly reduces erythema and the burning sensation.
2. Rebound effect
When its use is reduced or stopped, vasodilation, burning, and a severe inflammatory flare develop.
3. Reapplication
The patient uses it again to relieve the flare, establishing a cycle of dependence.
```
Clues to recognition
Clinical feature
What it suggests
Use of a potent corticosteroid on the face
This is the key history finding.
Rapid but temporary improvement
Encourages the patient to continue applying it.
Erythema, papules, and pustules
Produces an appearance similar to inflammatory rosacea.
Intense burning or stinging
Common, especially during the rebound effect.
Worsening after discontinuation
Suggests corticosteroid-induced dependence and rebound.
Practical diagnosis
In any rosacea-like facial eruption, always ask what products the patient is applying and for which areas they were originally prescribed.
1
Ask
Review creams, ointments, and treatments used in recent months.
2
Link
Link onset or worsening to facial corticosteroid use.
3
Warn
Explain that temporary worsening may occur during withdrawal.
```
Management
The essential measure is to withdraw the topical corticosteroid. However, after prolonged use, abrupt discontinuation can trigger a very severe flare and prompt the patient to apply it again.
Corticosteroid withdrawal
Explain the possibility of a rebound effect in advance.
Taper gradually when use has been prolonged.
Avoid restarting the corticosteroid in response to temporary worsening.
A topical calcineurin inhibitor may be considered as bridging therapy.
Treatment of the rosacea-like inflammation
Topical metronidazole.
Topical ivermectin.
Topical azelaic acid.
Oral doxycycline in moderate or severe cases.
Take-home message
Potent topical corticosteroids should not be used continuously on the face. They may provide initial improvement, but can also cause dependence, rebound, and progressively more severe rosacea-like dermatitis.
Final summary
Cause: prolonged use of topical corticosteroids, especially high-potency agents, on the face.
Clinical features: erythema, burning, flushing, papules, pustules, or inflammatory plaques.
Main clue: temporary improvement with the corticosteroid and worsening after discontinuation.
Problem: a cycle of dependence and reapplication may develop.
Management: corticosteroid withdrawal, counselling about rebound, and specific treatment of the rosacea-like component.
When rosacea improves briefly with corticosteroids but subsequently worsens, consider steroid rosacea.